CO129-061 - Public Offices - 1856 — Page 21

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed
Series Prev Next

controlling it.

But we submit, whether with firm deference, in fact with a Naval Officer would seize any ship by reason of any sick on board under the circumstances specified in the Act - the court would only have said) for having no papers at all, or forged or altered papers. The fact of the absence of papers would admit of no dispute and create no risk. The case of forged or fraudulently altered papers is the only one which would present any difficulty.

But in this case an Officer would not seize a ship unless his acquaintance with the forms of Emigration papers and with the signature of the Officers who issue and attest them were such as to give him a moral certainty that those produced to him were altered. In all cases of doubt he would, for his own sake, for the sake of caution, abstain from seizing a ship.

The last case in which it was contemplated in the letter to the Admiralty that an Officer might be required to act would be in conveying ... to ...

Edit History

2026-05-18 08:14:37 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
controlling it. But we submit, whether with firm deference, in fact with a Naval Officer would seize any ship by reason of any sick on board under the circumstances specified in the Act - the court would only have said) for having no papers at all, or forged or altered papers. The fact of the absence of papers would admit of no dispute and create no risk. The case of forged or fraudulently altered papers is the only one which would present any difficulty. But in this case an Officer would not seize a ship unless his acquaintance with the forms of Emigration papers and with the signature of the Officers who issue and attest them were such as to give him a moral certainty that those produced to him were altered. In all cases of doubt he would, for his own sake, for the sake of caution, abstain from seizing a ship. The last case in which it was contemplated in the letter to the Admiralty that an Officer might be required to act would be in conveying ... to ...
Baseline (Original)
S controlling it. _ But we trouts suderit, ce, whether ext deference, with fr in fact h a haval Officer wouts nieur any sick by seizinge repel a der the creueustanees specified in the Act - the coutd only he seized for have said) for having no papers at all, or forged or altered papers. The fact. of the absence of Papers would admit of no dispute and conto create no risk. The cave of forged or fraudulently altered. papers is the only aue which wonts presect any difficulty = Buten this case au Officer would of noh srije 19 ship unde unles his acquaintance with the forces of Emigration paperitwith the signature of the Officers who ipere and attest theen were such as to give him a moral certainty that those produced to hem werd altered. In all cases forged. Lake, as well out of of doubt he wouts for his own- for the sake Lustion, abstain from seiging ashif.. The lack case in which it -that a kanal was contemplated in the letter to the Adesinalty Officer right he required would be in connerying to act To an Aseurally
2026-05-18 08:14:37 · Baseline
View content

S

controlling it. _

But we trouts suderit,

ce, whether

ext deference,

with fr in fact

h a

haval Officer wouts

nieur any sick by seizinge

repel

a

der the creueustanees

specified in the Act - the coutd

only

he seized for

have said)

for having no papers at all, or forged or altered papers. The

fact. of

the absence of Papers

would admit of no dispute and conto create no risk. The cave

of forged or fraudulently altered. papers is the only

aue which

wonts presect any difficulty =

Buten this case

au

Officer would

of

noh srije

19

ship unde

unles

his acquaintance with the forces of Emigration paperitwith the signature of the Officers who

ipere

and attest theen were such

as to give him a moral certainty that those produced to hem werd altered. In all cases forged.

Lake, as well out

of

of doubt he wouts for his own-

for the sake Lustion, abstain from seiging

ashif..

The lack case in which it

-that a

kanal

was contemplated in the letter to the Adesinalty Officer right he required would be in connerying

to act

To an

Aseurally

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.